Champerty – another defence to a 'troll' attack?

Champerty is a doctrine of law which forbids certain situations in which a third party pays litigation expenses in return for a share in any proceeds. 

It’s an interesting idea for a defence to a patent ‘troll’ suit.  Peter Zura and Mark Walters have each commented on it in the past. 

Of course, it would only work against those ‘trolls’ who don’t own or licence the asserted patents.  Still, it will be interesting to see if it goes anywhere.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: