East River, New York, US
This photo highlights the reason I have such a desire to visit New York one day - a bustling and beautiful city by day and night.
photo credit: cabezadeturco

- 1709 Copyright Blog
- Afro-IP
- BLOG@IP::JUR
- Class 46
- GRAY on Claims
- Holman's Biotech IP Blog
- IAM Magazine
- Intellectual Property Watch
- Inventive Step
- IP ADR Blog
- IP Asset Maximizer Blog
- IP finance
- IP tango
- IPDragon
- ipeg
- IPKat
- ITC 337 Law Blog
- Managing Intellectual Property
- Michael Geist's Blog
- Orange Book Blog
- Patent Baristas
- Patent Circle
- Patent Docs
- Patently-O
- PatLit
- Peter Zura's 271 Blog
- Register trademark
- SpicyIP
- Tangible IP
- The IP Factor
- TTABlog
|
|
Monday, October 6, 2008 — STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF IP 3 ways to cut IP acquisition costsby Duncan BucknellThe burgening economic downturn continues to put pressure on all departments of companies to reduce costs. The intellectual property acquisition function is clearly no exception. So here's 5 suggestions, what would you add? 1 - review your portfolio to identify pending or registered IP rights of lower value now and in the future, prioritise them, and lapse them (saves on annuities and prosecution costs of any pending applications); 2 - consider filing divisionals or continuations to extend prosecution rather than expend money in the short term on attorneys (of course, the act of filing these applications carries a cost of its own); 3 - consider whether applications for IP protection can sensibly be delayed; 4 - use lower cost filing methods, so for example: hire a patent attorney to carry more of the drafting, filing and prosecution costs internally, use PCT or Madrid for international applications, PCTFiler for National Phase entry, etc. 5 - consider blending your current attorneys with a lower cost firm for more routine work.
Post a Comment | + del.icio.us | + technorati | tweet this | email this 6 CommentsDuncan saidThanks TJ - great suggestion. Another suggestion of course would be to bring more of your IP work in-house. If your corporate team will allow you the head-count... posted on Monday, October 6, 2008 8:29am Duncan saidThe insightful and ever present Jeremy Phillips (this time at IPFinance) has posted a great comment on this post: In global terms, I wonder whether the sort of savings which these
suggestions are likely to achieve are likely to be relatively trivial
in relation to the sort of business that is big enough to have the
option of making them. Might greater savings, or greater
income-generation, be made through cross-licensing of existing
technologies, the adoption of more cost-effective marketing techniques
such as co-branding, the responsible use of alternative dispute
resolution rather than court-driven infringement ligitation; where IP
rights are deemed superfluous, there is plenty of scope for developing
online auction and licensing sites too. Finally, the delaying of
applications in the pipeline looks like a recipe for chaos in the
future if all the businesses within any given sector decide to press on
with their previously-delayed applications at the same time. posted on Monday, October 6, 2008 9:32am Duncan saidJeremy - some quick notes on your great comments: posted on Monday, October 6, 2008 9:37am Kristian Beyer saidAnother option is outsourcing your patenting work to India/asia. Cuts down costs for expensive attorneys. I can be hard for non-global companies doing this though. Another version on your no. 1 is to only do IP that is important for your core business, and not waste money on something you don´t actually sell posted on Monday, October 6, 2008 4:20pm Duncan saidKristian - welcome and thank you. These are great points. posted on Monday, October 6, 2008 8:21pm |






















TJ said
Consider abandoning non-key countries (as these tend to the expensive ones)?
posted on Monday, October 6, 2008 8:24am