East River, New York, US
I like the picture because you can see how vibrant the city is and the river reminds you that this is a real working city. You can almost hear the noise of the crowd and traffic, which was the initial exhilarating sensory experience I had when I first visited New York in the early 1980s stepping out from Grand Central Station onto 42nd Street.
photo credit: cabezadeturco

- 1709 Copyright Blog
- Afro-IP
- BLOG@IP::JUR
- Class 46
- GRAY on Claims
- Holman's Biotech IP Blog
- IAM Magazine
- Intellectual Property Watch
- Inventive Step
- IP ADR Blog
- IP Asset Maximizer Blog
- IP finance
- IP tango
- IPDragon
- ipeg
- IPKat
- ITC 337 Law Blog
- Managing Intellectual Property
- Michael Geist's Blog
- Orange Book Blog
- Patent Baristas
- Patent Circle
- Patent Docs
- Patently-O
- PatLit
- Peter Zura's 271 Blog
- Register trademark
- SpicyIP
- Tangible IP
- The IP Factor
- TTABlog
|
|
Thursday, September 4, 2008 — IP ON THE NET Google Chrome EULA needs a polishby Ben LehmanGoogle release a new browser to much media attention this week. However it took some keen eyes to quickly spot some material issues with the EULA (end user licence agreement). Google’s standard EULA included an acknowledgement that “by submitting, posting or displaying [your content] you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services..” With the “Service” in this case being the Chrome browser, Google was effectively obtaining a right to publish and distribute anything you type into the browser or any website you visit. Google has since gone on to correct the issue by deleting the offending language.
While standard terms of service are great for efficiency, not all products or deals will fit into a pre-defined box. Whether it’s product terms and conditions, a licence agreement or even just general business dealings, it’s important to step back and critically evaluate whether what you used last time is really appropriate next time around. In some cases it’s more efficient to start over than try and squeeze a round peg into a square hole. All that said, credit to Google for admitting the issue and recognising that its standard EULA needed a bit more polish.
Post a Comment | + del.icio.us | + technorati | tweet this | email this 0 Comments |





















